HealthDay
(8/22, Gordon) reports on two studies published in the Aug. 22/29
issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association comparing
different means of predicting heart disease. The first study
compared "coronary artery calcium scans [CAC], ankle-brachial
index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), family history,
carotid intima-media thickness and brachial flow-mediated dilation," and
lead author Dr. Joseph Yeboah, assistant professor of cardiology at
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, NC said that the
coronary artery calcium scan was "far superior to all of the other
top-tier markers we studied." The other study was based on "data from 14
studies involving nearly 46,000 participants and found that the carotid
intima-media thickness test was associated with a small improvement in
heart disease prediction, but that the
improvement was so small it's likely not to be helpful in clinical
practice."
WebMD
(8/22, Boyles) reports that the first "study included about 1,300
people with heart disease risk factors (except diabetes) who were
determined to have an intermediate risk for developing heart disease,
based on the widely used prediction model known as the Framingham Risk
Score (FRS)." Then "after having all six of the tests, they were
followed for an average of" 7.5 years.
MedPage Today
(8/22, Phend) reports, "The group pointed out that cost and radiation
exposure from coronary artery calcium testing have to be assessed before
making broad recommendations about incorporating it into primary
prevention screening strategies." Also CAC is "unlikely to be useful for
tracking risk over time to look for a worsening trend." The story notes
that "the American College of Cardiology and American Heart
Association have given family history a class I recommendation for use
as an add-on to Framingham risk calculation, while carotid intima-media
thickness, coronary artery calcium, ankle-brachial index, and
high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) received class II recommendations. They
recommended against brachial flow-mediated dilation."
No comments:
Post a Comment