The AP
(5/16, Perrone) reports in a story appearing on over 470 news sites
that the Food and Drug Administration Blood Products Advisory Committee
in a unanimous 17-0 vote, "recommended approval of the first rapid,
over-the-counter HIV test." The committee concluded that "the benefits
of the OraQuick HIV test outweigh its potential risks for consumers,"
chiefly that it "does not appear to be as accurate as
professionally-administered diagnostics." The expected benefit from the
test is that people who have HIV and have not been tested will be more
likely to test themselves, though "the FDA estimated the test would miss
about 3,800 HIV-positive people per year, while correctly identifying
45,000, if approved for US consumers."
The Wall Street Journal
(5/16, A6, Dooren, Subscription Publication) reports the panel
concluded that the hoped for benefits were greater than the "potential
risks of false positive and false negative results." The test works on
saliva collected on a swab and inserted into material in a test tube.
The Washington Post
(5/16, Sun) reports the test would offer "an important additional tool
for many Americans who are reluctant to get tested." It also notes
that "a national poll conducted last spring by the Kaiser Family
Foundation found that 44 percent of Americans between ages 18 and 65
said they had never been tested for HIV. Asked to list reasons why they
had not been tested, 64 percent said they did not believe they were
at risk of contracting HIV, 29 percent said their doctor had never
recommended testing and 12 percent said they did not know where to go
for testing."
The Philadelphia Inquirer
(5/16, Sapatkin) reports, "The panel overcame considerable unknowns
and concerns the test cannot pick up newly acquired infections to focus
on a bigger picture."
No comments:
Post a Comment