Friday, May 25, 2012
Study examines unintended consequence of dialysis drug-rule changes.
The New York Times
(5/11, A24, Sack, Subscription Publication) reports, "A shift last
year by the federal government in how it pays for drugs to treat
dialysis patients may have had an unintended and potentially dire
consequence, according to new research: a significant jump in blood
transfusions for patients who now may not be getting enough of the
medications." The study, "to be presented Friday to a meeting of the
National
Kidney Foundation in Washington, found that dialysis clinics were
prescribing less of the drugs, as the government intended. But the
transfusion numbers suggest that dialysis providers, driven by the
revised incentives and new usage guidelines, have yet to find the right
medication level for some patients." Medicare and Food and Drug
Administration officials "said the findings would be reviewed to
determine whether drug usage guidance or reimbursement policy should be
revised."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment