The Wall Street Journal
(3/24, Loftus, Winslow, Subscription Publication) reported that while
the experimental anticlotting medication vorapaxar may reduce heart
risks, it may also increase bleeding risks, according to research
presented at the American College of Cardiology meeting and published
online in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The AP
(3/24) reported that the study, which included "more than 26,000
patients" in more than 30 countries, "was aimed at preventing repeat
heart attacks and strokes in people who had already suffered one."
Bloomberg News
(3/24, Langreth) reported that researchers found that participants who
received "vorapaxar along with standard therapy were 13 percent less
likely to have another heart attack or die from cardiovascular causes
than those on standard treatment." However, "171 more patients on
vorapaxar experienced moderate to severe bleeding." Additionally, "the
rate of brain bleeding doubled in the vorapaxar group."
MedPage Today
(3/24, Neale) reported, "The advantage for vorapaxar on the primary
endpoint was greatest among the patients with a history of MI."
Meanwhile, "the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage that
accompanied vorapaxar treatment was magnified in the patients with a
history of stroke."
HeartWire
(3/24, Hughes) reported that, when "asked whether he thought this would
be sufficient for approval of the drug," lead investigator Dr. David
Morrow "said: 'While I can't speak for the FDA, I can say that the
overall trial did meet its primary end point; the MI subgroup was a very
large one -- close to 18,000 patients, like a trial unto itself; and
this was a prespecified group. So we think this result is valid.'"
The Forbes (3/24, Husten) "CardioBrief" blog reported that the findings from this trial,
called "TRA 2P-TIMI 50, were broadly consistent with the TRACER trial
(published last November in the New England Journal of Medicine), which
tested the same drug in patients
with acute coronary syndromes." TRACER data
also indicated that "vorapaxar effectively reduced negative outcomes
but at the cost of an increase in serious bleeding complications." Reuters (3/24, Pierson, Sherman) also covered the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment