HealthDay
(4/6, Reinberg) reports, "For people suffering from uncomplicated
appendicitis, a course of antibiotics may be just as good as having the
appendix removed," according to a study published online April 5 in the
BMJ. After analyzing the results of "four studies in which at total of
900 patients with appendicitis were randomly assigned to surgery or
antibiotics," researchers found that "among patients treated with
antibiotics, 63 percent did not need any further treatment after a year.
In addition, antibiotic use resulted in 31 percent fewer complications
than surgery."
"Overall, 20% of the patients in the antibiotic group had an
appendectomy after readmission to the hospital within one year, and of
those, nine had perforated appendicitis and four had gangrenous
disease," MedPage Today
(4/6, Neale) reports. "There were no differences between the two
groups in treatment efficacy, length of stay, or the risk of developing
complicated appendicitis." An accompanying editorial pointed out that
"using antibiotics for initial treatment has some disadvantages,
including the need for delayed appendectomy in some patients with
persistent symptoms, the 20% chance of recurrence within the first year,
which may be unacceptable, and the need to perform CT in all patients
to rule out perforated appendicitis before starting antibiotics."
No comments:
Post a Comment