The New York Times
(1/5, A12, Harris, Subscription Publication) reports that the FDA
"announced on Wednesday that farmers and ranchers must restrict their
use of a critical class of antibiotics," cephalosporins, "in cattle,
pigs, chickens and turkeys because such practices may have contributed
to the growing threat in people of bacterial infections that are
resistant to treatment." The medicines "are among the most common
antibiotics prescribed to treat pneumonia, strep throat, and skin and
urinary tract infections." Michael R. Taylor,
deputy commissioner for foods at the FDA, said, "We believe this is an
imperative step in preserving the effectiveness of this class of
important antimicrobials that takes into account the need to protect the
health of both humans and animals."
The AP (1/5, Jalonick) reports, "In a statement
on the FDA website, the agency said the announcement is 'among a
number of ongoing FDA activities and initiatives intended to address
concerns about the use of antimicrobial drugs in animal agriculture.'"
These "include increased monitoring and voluntary guidelines for
producers on how to use the drugs judiciously."
The Wall Street Journal
(1/5, Tomson, Subscription Publication) reports the FDA said that in
2010, US farm animals were given roughly 54,000 pounds of
cephalosporins, although altogether, the animals consumed more than 29
million pounds of antibiotics.
The Washington Post
(1/5, Elboghdady) reports, "The antibiotics can no longer be used to
prevent diseases in livestock starting April 5, though they can still be
used to treat illnesses, the FDA said." Although "consumer advocates
support the FDA's decision," they contend that "the move is long overdue
and deals with only one small part of a much larger public health issue
tied to the overuse of antibiotics in animals."
The Chicago Tribune
(1/5, Eng) reports that US Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) said, "This is
a modest first step by the FDA," although "we're really just looking at
the tip of the iceberg. We don't have time for the FDA to ploddingly
take half-measures." According to Slaughter, "We are staring at a
massive public health threat in the rise of antibiotic-resistant
superbugs."
The Los Angeles Times
(1/5, Brown) "Booster Shots" blog reports that Slaughter also said,
"With over 1 million Salmonella cases in the US each year, at least
30,000 Americans will contract cephalosporin-resistant bacteria every
year. I'm glad the FDA is finally acting but how many Americans have
needlessly been sickened in the meantime?"
CQ
(1/5, Ethridge, Subscription Publication) reports, "American Academy of
Pediatrics President Robert Block also praised the decision, noting
that cephalosporin drugs are often used to treat several serious
childhood infections and have no warnings for pediatric use." According
to Block, "Pediatricians are already limited in the number and types of
antibiotics that we can use to treat ill children, and when one type of
antibiotic is found to be resistant to a strain of an infection, some
of our sickest young patients are left without
life-saving treatment options."
The National Journal
(1/5, Fox, Subscription Publication) reports, "The comment period on
the new order closes on March 6." The agency "first proposed the rule
in 2008 and has been tweaking it ever since because of objections from a
range of groups."
Also covering the story are Bloomberg News (1/5, Peterson, Armour), the Lincoln (NE) Journal Star (1/5, Hovey), Reuters (1/5, Yukhananov), HealthDay (1/5, Preidt), and MedPage Today (1/5, Walker).
No comments:
Post a Comment